Evaluations are found at the end of the write-up. They can be part of the conclusion or a separate section, whatever suits you best. Which is the best order of events?
Prediction - method - results - conclusion - evaluation. Method - prediction - results - evaluation - conclusion. Results - method - prediction - evaluation - conclusion. Evaluation - prediction - method - results - conclusion. The other answers are less logiccal ways of writing a report and this is the format that will be expected if you study biology at higher levels or publish research reports.
Scientists evaluate in order to Some people see evaluation as a negative skill. It is not. It is a very important skill to have and getting into the habit of evaluating your biology experiments will help you to develop this skill for use when you are an adult. Evaluation is an assessment of Again quite tricky until you get the knack. The reproducibility of results by others is one of the cornerstones of the scientific method.
Your science experimental results section should be well presented and include your data in table and graphical form. Any calculations you used on your data including statistical tests if required should also be in this section. Presentation is everything and all graphs should have a title and all axis should be labelled. Do not scale your graphs so that they fill the entire page and butt right up against the margin a pet hate of mine.
It is better to divide your scale by two and have a smaller half sized graph in the centre of the page. If you use this approach you may be able to fit more than one graph per page allowing the reader to review your graphical data and spot trends more easily. If the graphs are on separate pages then they have to flip back and forth between them. You need to choose the correct type of graph for the data you are presenting.
A histogram is ideal for comparing two groups whilst a line graph is better for showing how enzyme activity varies with temperature. You must resist the temptation to make any comments on your results in the results section. That is what the conclusion section is for. An experienced scientist will, by looking at the your results, be formulating their own conclusions based on your data and you should not influence your reader by including your own thoughts and comments here.
Once the reader has reviewed your data and maybe come up with their own conclusion they can then move on to the conclusion section and see if your conclusion and theirs agree. A half page conclusion is not going to get you a good grade. You should quote the data in the results section in support of the scientific conclusion you are making.
Such as "as can be seen by graph 3 there is a marked difference between group A and group B which allows the conclusion that You should state if the hypothesis has been supported or not. Your readers can then decide if they agree or disagree with your conclusions. This is the basis of scientific debate. If the data obtained is not sufficient to support or reject the hypothesis state why and propose further work that will help to generate more data allowing you to be able to draw a firmer conclusion.
You should include here sources of error that might effect the results. Remember a good scientist is always self critical. If you have used measuring apparatus such as weighing scales for mass or glassware for measuring volumes then you may need to calculate the percentage error of the measuring apparatus. The formula is the smallest graduation halved then divide that number by the volume or mass measured.
Finally multiply by to get a percentage. If you have used a pipette to measure 20cm 3 of solution and the smallest graduations on the pipette are 0. And that seems like something we should be facilitating in our laboratories.
You may wish to check which terms your exam board prefers. During lockdown, teachers worked so hard to create engaging remote resources.
Scientists dispel the theory that sunlight exposure simply fragments macroplastics that persist in the environment, but what are the implications for the environment? Link forensic science and the Covid pandemic to your lessons on instrumental analysis, separation techniques, data interpretation and health with UN sustainable development goals 16 and Easy-to-implement ways to link these topics to your lessons on energy sources, water resources, nanochemistry, health and climate change.
Site powered by Webvision Cloud. Skip to main content Skip to navigation. Source: RedlineVector. Download all. Topics Higher-order thinking and metacognition Pedagogy Resources Skills. Related articles. News Cooling homes with an endothermic reaction TZ Looking at the use of ammonium nitrate in a new and renewable cooling process.
Ideas Reuse remote teaching resources TZ During lockdown, teachers worked so hard to create engaging remote resources. Aspect 1: Concluding Aspect 2: Evaluating procedure s Aspect 3: Improving the investigation States a conclusion, with justification , based on a reasonable interpretation of the data.
Evaluates weaknesses and limitations. Suggests realistic improvements in respect of identified weaknesses and limitations. Chem IA Aspirin Lab. Chem Ia Calcium Carbonate Lab.
0コメント